header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

LNB news: Law Society responds to Law Commission consultation on hate crime

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
19 January 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Law Society has responded to the Law Commission’s September 2020 consultation on proposals to reform hate crime laws
Lexis®Library update: The Law Commission's proposals included ‘equalising protection across all of the existing protected characteristics’, ‘adding sex or gender to the protected characteristics’ and ‘establishing criteria for deciding whether any additional characteristics should be recognised in hate crime laws’, such as ageism and misogyny.

The Law Society agreed with the Law Commission regarding the benefits of reform which allow for higher ‘consistency, clarity and fairness’.

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 18 January 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.com

Source:  https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/campaigns/consultation-responses/law-commissions-consultation-on-hate-crime-law-society-response

 

Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur under scrutiny
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
NLJ this week: Does dishonesty always mean strike-off?
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
NLJ this week: Potanin, prenups & privacy
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
NLJ this week: Malaysia’s arbitration overhaul
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
NLJ this week: Greed but no fraud in £1.4bn SKAT case
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll