header-logo header-logo

17 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-detail

LNB News: Law Society response: HMRC discussion document on helping taxpayers get offshore tax right

The Law Society has responded to HMRC’s consultation seeking views on ways to help taxpayers get their offshore tax right first time. 

Lexis®Library update: The Society agrees that the use of offshore data to inform HMRC’s communications and prompts to taxpayers, and particularly to agents, could promote compliance but advises caution where data is incomplete or misleading.

The discussion document focuses on how HMRC could:

  • use data in different ways to help taxpayers get their offshore tax right
  • better support taxpayers with their offshore tax obligations
  • work with agents and intermediaries to help promote offshore tax compliance amongst taxpayers

The Law Society considers how HMRC might collect and use data and carry out its communications and compliance work effectively in order to support taxpayers in relation to their offshore tax obligations.

Key response points include:

  • using offshore data has the potential to help taxpayers get their offshore tax right, but HMRC should consider the risks associated with incomplete or misleading data
  • although it could be helpful for HMRC to inform a taxpayer’s tax adviser that the taxpayer has offshore assets, issues around taxpayer confidentiality (for example, where the taxpayer uses different advisers for advice and compliance) and agent authorisation would need to be considered
  • appropriate prompts for taxpayers, including on tax returns themselves, could be helpful
  • invitations could be provided to prompted taxpayers to contact HMRC along with links to relevant information
  • in deciding whether more information about sources of income, amounts and payment dates should be required of taxpayers, consideration should be given to minimising any consequent additional compliance burden (for example, by including a de minimis threshold)
  • an awareness campaign may be a good idea in the context of offshore tax, as well as dedicated information tailored to common scenarios

See Simon’s TaxesA4.576

Source: HMRC discussion document on helping taxpayers get offshore tax right – Law Society response

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 16 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

Categories: Legal News , Tax
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll