header-logo header-logo

20 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Covid-19 , International justice
printer mail-detail

LNB News: Lord Sales gives speech on implications of Brexit and coronavirus (COVID-19)

Lord Sales has given a speech on the implications of Brexit and coronavirus (COVID-19) for UK law to the New Zealand Senior Courts Judges’ Conference. 
Lexis®Library update: The speech, which was delivered virtually, covered the role of retained EU law, the effect of Brexit on the UK’s relationship to other common law jurisdictions, and the impact of coronavirus on the operation of British courts.

Lord Sales explained to the conference how retained EU law operates within the post-Brexit UK legal system. He delved into the body of law retained by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 as amended by the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020, the status of pre-Brexit Court of Justice of the EU decisions, and the ability of UK courts to depart from retained EU case law as provided by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Relevant Court) (Retained EU Case Law) Regulations 2020.

With regards to relationships with other common law jurisdictions, Lord Sales has indicated that he feels that these relationships will likely be strengthened and cited commentary on the resurgence of common law doctrines.

Lord Sales shared his concerns that coronavirus will have a very serious impact on the effective operation of the courts and highlighted the immense backlog in the criminal courts, which was exacerbated by the pandemic. However, he also expressed optimism with regards to remote hearings and virtual technology, which he has said will likely have a defined purpose in the long term. In Lord Sales’ view, online adjudication may provide a means to reduce the time and cost involved in settling disputes and improving access to justice.

Source: IMPLICATIONS OF BREXIT AND COVID-19 FOR UK LAW New Zealand Senior Courts Judges’ Conference, Tauranga, 15 – 17 April 2021

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 19 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll