header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 July 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

LNB news: MoJ consults on draft scheme regulations for Judicial Pension Scheme 2022

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced that it is seeking views on the draft scheme regulations for the Judicial Pension Scheme 2022

Lexis®Library update: While being specific to the Judiciary of England and Wales, the aim is to rectify a long standing lack of pension provision for a significant proportion of judges who work on a fee paid basis and to simplify the current mixture of judicial pension schemes. The consultation closes on 8 October 2021.

The consultation can be found here and the draft scheme regulations here.

Views can be submitted by email to reformedpensionconsultation@justice.gov.uk.

Source: Judicial Pension Scheme 2022: Scheme Regulations

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 21 July 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
NLJ this week: Mandelson, Epstein & the court of popular opinion
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
NLJ this week: Volunteers, promotions & perilous appeals
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
NLJ this week: 40 years on, has PACE lost its edge?
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll