header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: SRA guidance updates and new warning notice published

The SRA has announced the publication of a range of new guidance covering the financial sanctions regime, immigration work and effective supervision. It has also issued a warning notice on involvement in strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs).

Lexis®Library update: The SRA’s new financial sanctions guidance is aimed at firms to ensure they understand their obligations under the financial sanctions regime and what they need to do to comply. It includes a comparison table setting out differences between the sanctions and AML regimes, guidance on controls firms should put in place, screening tools, what to do if a client is sanctioned, reporting obligations, licensing, and the interaction between reporting obligations and legal professional privilege. It also includes guidance on risk assessments, including a list of risk factors and a list of red flags for attempted circumvention of the sanctions regime.

The SRA’s new immigration guidance follows on from its recent thematic review of immigration and asylum work. It covers communications with clients, preparing properly for online hearings, and making it easier for clients to complain or give feedback. 

Effective supervision was one of the areas covered in the immigration thematic review and it is this that has triggered the SRA to produce separate overarching guidance on effective supervision applicable to all solicitors and firms that supervise individuals delivering legal services, including services that are provided by individuals not regulated by the SRA.

The SRA’s latest warning notice sets out the SRA’s expectations in relation to identifying proposed courses of action that could be characterised as SLAPPs, the sorts of behaviours that concern the SRA and that are likely to result in regulatory action and its expectations around the labelling or marking of correspondence. The warning notice is aimed at all SRA-regulated firms and individuals who conduct litigation or give dispute resolution and pre-action advice.

Sources:

• Sanctions regime guidance helps firms stay compliant

• Review looks at the competence of immigration service providers

• Solicitors warned about involvement in SLAPPs

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 28 November 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll