header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: SRA guidance updates and new warning notice published

The SRA has announced the publication of a range of new guidance covering the financial sanctions regime, immigration work and effective supervision. It has also issued a warning notice on involvement in strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs).

Lexis®Library update: The SRA’s new financial sanctions guidance is aimed at firms to ensure they understand their obligations under the financial sanctions regime and what they need to do to comply. It includes a comparison table setting out differences between the sanctions and AML regimes, guidance on controls firms should put in place, screening tools, what to do if a client is sanctioned, reporting obligations, licensing, and the interaction between reporting obligations and legal professional privilege. It also includes guidance on risk assessments, including a list of risk factors and a list of red flags for attempted circumvention of the sanctions regime.

The SRA’s new immigration guidance follows on from its recent thematic review of immigration and asylum work. It covers communications with clients, preparing properly for online hearings, and making it easier for clients to complain or give feedback. 

Effective supervision was one of the areas covered in the immigration thematic review and it is this that has triggered the SRA to produce separate overarching guidance on effective supervision applicable to all solicitors and firms that supervise individuals delivering legal services, including services that are provided by individuals not regulated by the SRA.

The SRA’s latest warning notice sets out the SRA’s expectations in relation to identifying proposed courses of action that could be characterised as SLAPPs, the sorts of behaviours that concern the SRA and that are likely to result in regulatory action and its expectations around the labelling or marking of correspondence. The warning notice is aimed at all SRA-regulated firms and individuals who conduct litigation or give dispute resolution and pre-action advice.

Sources:

• Sanctions regime guidance helps firms stay compliant

• Review looks at the competence of immigration service providers

• Solicitors warned about involvement in SLAPPs

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 28 November 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll