header-logo header-logo

18 September 2015 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7668 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

​Local news

nlj_7668_dobson

How local must local housing be, asks Nicholas Dobson

What does the “local” in local housing mean? In particular can a local housing authority discharge its duties to homeless people by offering them accommodation over 50 miles outside its area? “No” came the clear and unanimous answer from the Supreme Court on 2 April 2015 in the circumstances of the matter before it. This was Nzolameso v City of Westminster [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] 2 All ER 942 and Lady Hale (as deputy president) gave the sole judgment on behalf of herself and her colleagues: Lords Clarke, Reed, Hughes and Toulson.

She opened by posing the key question: when was it “lawful for a local housing authority to accommodate a homeless person a long way away from the authority’s own area where the homeless person was previously living?” For there was “no doubt that, for a variety of reasons, such ‘out of borough’ placements have become increasingly common in recent years”.

Local housing authorities have a statutory duty under s 208(1) of the Housing Act 1996

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll