header-logo header-logo

29 October 2025
Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail

Ministers put whiplash policy under review

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has launched a review of its whiplash policies, including fixed tariffs, statutory definition of the injury, ban on settling cases without medical evidence and small claims limit

Reforms to whiplash injury claims were introduced seven years ago by Part 1 of the Civil Liability Act 2018. Fixed tariffs were introduced where the injury or injuries lasted less than two years. Insurers and claimants were barred from settling claims before medical evidence had been produced.

At the same time, the threshold for the small claims track was raised from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic accident claims, bringing many more cases within its remit.

Addressing the House of Commons this week, justice minister Sarah Sackman KC said the MoJ will carry out a post-implementation review of these measures, and of the Official Injury Claim portal. The review will be published in the spring.

The MoJ launched a call for evidence this week, due to run until 22 December.

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said the portal had got off to ‘a challenging start’.

‘We remain concerned about the length of time it takes to resolve road traffic claims, particularly those involving whiplash injuries,’ Dixon said.

‘With average settlement times now reported to be exceeding 600 days, there are serious questions about how cases are being managed within the portal. We hope this review will provide a clear picture of what is working and where improvements are needed, so that people with injuries are receiving fair and timely outcomes.’

Respond to the call for evidence here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll