header-logo header-logo

Location, location, location

19 April 2012 / Teniola Onabanjo , Paul Lowenstein KC
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Paul Lowenstein QC & Teniola Onabanjo detail why London has become a centre for international litigation

Few will have missed the High Court battle between Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich. JSC BTA Bank’s many claims against Mukhtar Ablyazov and others in relation to an alleged fraud are also ongoing. These high profile cases involving foreign nationals highlight the increasing regularity with which international disputes are litigated in London. Presently, in the Commercial Court approximately 86% of cases involve at least one foreign party and in around 50% of cases all parties are from outside the UK. A glance at the Chancery cause list reveals a similar picture.

In some of these instances, the action will be brought in London because jurisdiction has been established, by agreement or under common law or European forum rules. However, a large number of litigants are choosing to resolve their disputes before the English courts in circumstances where the parties have little or no connection to England. What is driving them to do so?

Legal expertise

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll