header-logo header-logo

Location, location, location

19 April 2012 / Teniola Onabanjo , Paul Lowenstein KC
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Paul Lowenstein QC & Teniola Onabanjo detail why London has become a centre for international litigation

Few will have missed the High Court battle between Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich. JSC BTA Bank’s many claims against Mukhtar Ablyazov and others in relation to an alleged fraud are also ongoing. These high profile cases involving foreign nationals highlight the increasing regularity with which international disputes are litigated in London. Presently, in the Commercial Court approximately 86% of cases involve at least one foreign party and in around 50% of cases all parties are from outside the UK. A glance at the Chancery cause list reveals a similar picture.

In some of these instances, the action will be brought in London because jurisdiction has been established, by agreement or under common law or European forum rules. However, a large number of litigants are choosing to resolve their disputes before the English courts in circumstances where the parties have little or no connection to England. What is driving them to do so?

Legal expertise

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll