header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012 / Teniola Onabanjo , Paul Lowenstein KC
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Location, location, location

Paul Lowenstein QC & Teniola Onabanjo detail why London has become a centre for international litigation

Few will have missed the High Court battle between Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich. JSC BTA Bank’s many claims against Mukhtar Ablyazov and others in relation to an alleged fraud are also ongoing. These high profile cases involving foreign nationals highlight the increasing regularity with which international disputes are litigated in London. Presently, in the Commercial Court approximately 86% of cases involve at least one foreign party and in around 50% of cases all parties are from outside the UK. A glance at the Chancery cause list reveals a similar picture.

In some of these instances, the action will be brought in London because jurisdiction has been established, by agreement or under common law or European forum rules. However, a large number of litigants are choosing to resolve their disputes before the English courts in circumstances where the parties have little or no connection to England. What is driving them to do so?

Legal expertise

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll