header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012 / Teniola Onabanjo , Paul Lowenstein KC
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Location, location, location

Paul Lowenstein QC & Teniola Onabanjo detail why London has become a centre for international litigation

Few will have missed the High Court battle between Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich. JSC BTA Bank’s many claims against Mukhtar Ablyazov and others in relation to an alleged fraud are also ongoing. These high profile cases involving foreign nationals highlight the increasing regularity with which international disputes are litigated in London. Presently, in the Commercial Court approximately 86% of cases involve at least one foreign party and in around 50% of cases all parties are from outside the UK. A glance at the Chancery cause list reveals a similar picture.

In some of these instances, the action will be brought in London because jurisdiction has been established, by agreement or under common law or European forum rules. However, a large number of litigants are choosing to resolve their disputes before the English courts in circumstances where the parties have little or no connection to England. What is driving them to do so?

Legal expertise

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll