header-logo header-logo

07 September 2020
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Locked up without trial

Plans to increase custody time limits from 182 to 238 days have prompted alarm among legal professionals

Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland unveiled the proposed two-month extension this week, as part of a package of measures to address the backlog of cases. It will apply to persons accused of offences due to be heard in the Crown court, is expected to come into force on 28 September and will remain in place for nine months.

However, legal rights group Justice hit back with a stern rebuke, pointing out that time limits can already be extended on an individual basis due to illness, absence, the need for separate trials or some other good reason, and that a Coronavirus Crisis Protocol for the Effective Handling of Custody time Limit Cases has been in place since April, with judges and prosecutors deciding each case on an individual basis.

Justice said, in a statement, that it was ‘therefore extremely concerned that this measure will create a blanket extension of detention for all those remanded in custody, irrespective of their circumstances.

‘The right to liberty is protected by Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This requires the question of whether continued detention is justified or necessary to be decided on the circumstances of each individual case.’

Justice suggested, instead, that fully remote jury trials be used, where all participants join via video, jurors joining together in a socially distanced hub, and with the hearing livestreamed to a virtual public gallery. It said it had tested this option and found it fair.

Justice director Andrea Coomber said extending time limits sent a message ‘government is not prioritising the administration of justice during this crisis’. 

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar Council said: ‘We are very concerned that this 25% increase in the lawful detention of a potentially innocent person because there aren’t enough courts available to hear their trial does not become a license to push off cases for longer than absolutely necessary.’

Jury trials resumed in May but have been vastly reduced due to social distancing requirements. So far, ten temporary Nightingale courts have opened. 

Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll