header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 November 2019 / Bryan Clark
Issue: 7866 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Lomax v Lomax & the future of compulsory mediation

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
12265
Bryan Clark provides a backdrop to the current law & practice around compulsory mediation
  • Compulsory mediation can be criticised on practical and policy grounds and significant barriers to mediation exist in legal circles and also with litigants.
  • However, mediation can be successful even when parties do not enter the process under their own steam.

There have been few issues more controversial in the English civil justice arena than compulsory mediation. Over recent years, a broad range of opinions has been voiced and much ink spilt over this matter. While the official position remains in England and Wales that compulsory mediation is not sanctioned, the recent Court of Appeal case of Lomax v Lomax [2019] EWCA Civ 1467, [2019] All ER (D) 87 (Aug) has again thrust the issue into the spotlight and may be seen as a catalyst for change. This article provides a backdrop to the current law and practice around compulsory mediation in England and Wales, reviews the decision in Lomax and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Rent reforms unleash tribunal turmoil
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
NLJ this week: Jury cuts won’t cure court crisis
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
NLJ this week: Brain data could rewrite family justice
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
NLJ this week: Offensive speech still protected, court rules
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
NLJ this week: Arbitration appeals face hard stop
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll