header-logo header-logo

London to get new ‘state-of-the-art’ court

06 July 2018
Issue: 7801 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

Lawyers give a mixed reaction to a £300m court for fraud, cybercrime and economic crime cases that is to be built in London.

The flagship 18-courtroom legal centre will also deal with business and property work as well as civil cases, boosting lawyers’ hopes that the Capital will retain its status as a legal hub post-Brexit. It will replace the Mayor’s and City of London County Court, and City of London Magistrates’ Court, and will include a new City of London police station.

The new court will be built on the site of Fleetbank House, behind Fleet Street, currently home to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The existing building will be torn down and the EAT will relocate to the Rolls Building on Fetter Lane.

Lord Chancellor David Gauke said: ‘This state-of-the-art court is a further message to the world that Britain both prizes business and stands ready to deal with the changing nature of 21st century crime.’

The Ministry of Justice expects the court to be finished by 2025.

Peter Binning, partner at Corker Binning, said: ‘It is the first announcement of serious investment in the fabric of the criminal justice system for decades.

‘It suggests that the City of London Corporation at least is keen to send a message to the City that commercial crime and in particular cybercrime will be dealt with seriously in the future.’

However, he added: ‘It says far less about the government’s true commitment in this area and begs serious questions as to how this new court will be used if inadequate resources are devoted to the investigation and prosecution of serious and complex fraud.’

Law Society president Joe Egan said: ‘A new state-of-the-art court to increase the country’s capacity to tackle cybercrime and fraud will undoubtedly reassure business and help maintain England and Wales as the global centre for legal services post-Brexit.

‘Fees charged by this and London’s pre-eminent international dispute resolution courts will, however, need to become more competitive if our jurisdiction is to continue to attract commercial parties from across the globe. With an annual net worth of £26bn—1.5% of GDP—and exports of £4bn, UK legal services make a huge contribution to UK plc in a highly competitive global market.’

Issue: 7801 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll