header-logo header-logo

London: holding its own?

09 May 2019 / Julian Acratopulo
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Brexit , ADR , Litigation trends , Trends
printer mail-detail
London International Disputes Week offers us the opportunity to showcase the UK’s legal hub, says Julian Acratopulo

The cloud of Brexit has hung over the London legal community for almost three years now, with many all too willing to admit that ‘winter is coming’. The analogy to Westeros is self-evidently extreme, but it is clear that London faces very real competition to its position as the pre-eminent global forum for the resolution of international disputes. Much has been written and said about the new commercial courts that have been set up in Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Paris and Brussels. They have a clear objective to drum up support for the resolution of disputes, in a post-Brexit world, which might have previously been dealt with in London. That competition is, however, just the continuation of a trend which has seen the emergence of international courts in Asia and the Middle East. Those challengers are well funded, supported by substantial infrastructure and have for a long time been attracting judicial talent away from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll