header-logo header-logo

09 May 2019 / Julian Acratopulo
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Brexit , ADR , Litigation trends , Trends
printer mail-detail

London: holding its own?

London International Disputes Week offers us the opportunity to showcase the UK’s legal hub, says Julian Acratopulo

The cloud of Brexit has hung over the London legal community for almost three years now, with many all too willing to admit that ‘winter is coming’. The analogy to Westeros is self-evidently extreme, but it is clear that London faces very real competition to its position as the pre-eminent global forum for the resolution of international disputes. Much has been written and said about the new commercial courts that have been set up in Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Paris and Brussels. They have a clear objective to drum up support for the resolution of disputes, in a post-Brexit world, which might have previously been dealt with in London. That competition is, however, just the continuation of a trend which has seen the emergence of international courts in Asia and the Middle East. Those challengers are well funded, supported by substantial infrastructure and have for a long time been attracting judicial talent away from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll