header-logo header-logo

London: holding its own?

09 May 2019 / Julian Acratopulo
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Brexit , ADR , Litigation trends , Trends
printer mail-detail
London International Disputes Week offers us the opportunity to showcase the UK’s legal hub, says Julian Acratopulo

The cloud of Brexit has hung over the London legal community for almost three years now, with many all too willing to admit that ‘winter is coming’. The analogy to Westeros is self-evidently extreme, but it is clear that London faces very real competition to its position as the pre-eminent global forum for the resolution of international disputes. Much has been written and said about the new commercial courts that have been set up in Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Paris and Brussels. They have a clear objective to drum up support for the resolution of disputes, in a post-Brexit world, which might have previously been dealt with in London. That competition is, however, just the continuation of a trend which has seen the emergence of international courts in Asia and the Middle East. Those challengers are well funded, supported by substantial infrastructure and have for a long time been attracting judicial talent away from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll