header-logo header-logo

London International Disputes Week

09 January 2019
Issue: 7823 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

A dispute resolution collective of leading lawyers, firms and professional bodies will stage a major four-day event in London this summer.

London International Disputes Week (7–10 May) aims to bring together legal practitioners from around the world to celebrate London’s heritage as a disputes centre and to consider the future of dispute resolution.

It has the backing of the judiciary and central government, and is timed to promote the status of English law and dispute resolution in the wake of Brexit.

Offering her support to the event, Dame Elizabeth Gloster, former Lady Justice of Appeal, said: ‘London has long been a respected centre for handling disputes, but this is not a time for complacency.

‘The event will provide our great city with the opportunity to showcase our heritage, whilst looking ahead to the future and how we will adapt, evolve and progress.’

The Week will include a flagship one-day conference entitled ‘London international disputes: present and future’, and 18 technical sessions on disputes topics at venues across central London.

It was planned as a result of conversations across London’s legal community in late 2017 and early 2018.

Barry Fletcher, head of the dispute resolution group and head of arbitration at LexisNexis, explains: ‘Given London’s position as arguably the world’s leading seat of arbitration, conversations were being had across London, including within the Lexis®PSL Arbitration Consulting Editorial Board, on the merits and demerits of a London Arbitration Week (or LAW) and post-Brexit dispute resolution. When those parallel conversations merged it became apparent quickly that celebrating London’s broader role in global dispute resolution was the more important, if more daunting, task.’

Issue: 7823 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll