header-logo header-logo

Londoners to lose out

18 January 2012
Issue: 7497 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Nearly 77,000 Londoners will lose access to legal aid under current government plans

The London Advice Watch report, published last week by the Legal Action Group (LAG), shows the impact of proposed cuts on individuals and advice centres, such as law centres and Citizens Advice Bureaux.

Steve Hynes, director of LAG, says Londoners would lose access to advice on housing, employment, debt, benefits and immigration.

“Firms of solicitors and advice agencies will lose £9.33m in funding and many will be threatened with closure,” he says.

“It is not unreasonable to say that nearly half of London’s 28 advice centres will close, and that about half of the 900 London law firms who do legal aid work will close.

“The King’s College report showing the knock-on effect of cutting legal aid was very interesting. It’s a completely false economy to cut back on legal aid for social welfare law—there’s a saying that, for every £1 spent on advice centres, £9 is saved on other state expenditure.

“Timely advice that nips problems in the bud saves them from spiralling out of control into other problems such as debt or housing. It’s a particular shame for smaller agencies that serve particular communities, many of which will disappear—these groups are the ‘big society’ writ large.”

The research showed the cuts are likely to be unpopular—88% of Londoners believe advice on common legal problems should be free to all, or to those on or below the national average income, and 94% of people who got advice received a free service.

Hynes said “A lot of families are facing problems, including the middle classes. Our research found that eight per cent of people in social groups A and B who sought advice in the last year needed advice on benefits.”

 

Issue: 7497 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll