header-logo header-logo

Londoners to lose out

18 January 2012
Issue: 7497 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Nearly 77,000 Londoners will lose access to legal aid under current government plans

The London Advice Watch report, published last week by the Legal Action Group (LAG), shows the impact of proposed cuts on individuals and advice centres, such as law centres and Citizens Advice Bureaux.

Steve Hynes, director of LAG, says Londoners would lose access to advice on housing, employment, debt, benefits and immigration.

“Firms of solicitors and advice agencies will lose £9.33m in funding and many will be threatened with closure,” he says.

“It is not unreasonable to say that nearly half of London’s 28 advice centres will close, and that about half of the 900 London law firms who do legal aid work will close.

“The King’s College report showing the knock-on effect of cutting legal aid was very interesting. It’s a completely false economy to cut back on legal aid for social welfare law—there’s a saying that, for every £1 spent on advice centres, £9 is saved on other state expenditure.

“Timely advice that nips problems in the bud saves them from spiralling out of control into other problems such as debt or housing. It’s a particular shame for smaller agencies that serve particular communities, many of which will disappear—these groups are the ‘big society’ writ large.”

The research showed the cuts are likely to be unpopular—88% of Londoners believe advice on common legal problems should be free to all, or to those on or below the national average income, and 94% of people who got advice received a free service.

Hynes said “A lot of families are facing problems, including the middle classes. Our research found that eight per cent of people in social groups A and B who sought advice in the last year needed advice on benefits.”

 

Issue: 7497 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll