header-logo header-logo

18 January 2012
Issue: 7497 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Londoners to lose out

Nearly 77,000 Londoners will lose access to legal aid under current government plans

The London Advice Watch report, published last week by the Legal Action Group (LAG), shows the impact of proposed cuts on individuals and advice centres, such as law centres and Citizens Advice Bureaux.

Steve Hynes, director of LAG, says Londoners would lose access to advice on housing, employment, debt, benefits and immigration.

“Firms of solicitors and advice agencies will lose £9.33m in funding and many will be threatened with closure,” he says.

“It is not unreasonable to say that nearly half of London’s 28 advice centres will close, and that about half of the 900 London law firms who do legal aid work will close.

“The King’s College report showing the knock-on effect of cutting legal aid was very interesting. It’s a completely false economy to cut back on legal aid for social welfare law—there’s a saying that, for every £1 spent on advice centres, £9 is saved on other state expenditure.

“Timely advice that nips problems in the bud saves them from spiralling out of control into other problems such as debt or housing. It’s a particular shame for smaller agencies that serve particular communities, many of which will disappear—these groups are the ‘big society’ writ large.”

The research showed the cuts are likely to be unpopular—88% of Londoners believe advice on common legal problems should be free to all, or to those on or below the national average income, and 94% of people who got advice received a free service.

Hynes said “A lot of families are facing problems, including the middle classes. Our research found that eight per cent of people in social groups A and B who sought advice in the last year needed advice on benefits.”

 

Issue: 7497 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll