header-logo header-logo

Long-awaited reforms on mental health

13 November 2024
Issue: 8094 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have welcomed the Mental Health Bill, which modernises the law regarding detention and compulsory treatment

The Bill, which was introduced in the House of Lords last week, will reform the Mental Health Act 1983—found to be outdated by a 2018 independent review conducted by Professor Sir Simon Wessely.

The review identified rising rates of detention, racial disparities in detention and treatment orders, poor patient experience and disadvantages felt by people with a learning disability and autistic people.

According to the government, the Bill aims to give people greater choice and autonomy over their treatment, will end the use of police cells to detain someone experiencing a mental health crisis, and will require clinicians to review a patient’s treatment more frequently. It clarifies that individuals should only be detained if their condition means they are a risk of serious harm to themselves or others, and treatment in detention has a reasonable prospect of helping them.

Families and friends will be given more opportunities to contribute to decisions about treatment. The government also says it wants to limit the length of time people with a learning disability and autistic people can be detained under the Act if they do not have a co-occurring mental health condition that needs hospital treatment and have not committed a criminal offence.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘We are pleased it protects patients from inappropriate detention and provides them with enough involvement and support in decisions about their care.

‘We hope the Bill will give mental health patients access to justice, dignity and the respect they deserve. In the previous parliament, we had worked closely with the joint committee on the draft Mental Health Bill. We will continue to scrutinise the newly published Bill to ensure that it provides agency to individuals.’

The Bill is due to have its second reading at the end of this month.

Issue: 8094 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll