header-logo header-logo

Long hours, stress & unsustainable fees at the Family Bar

11 December 2025
Categories: Legal News , Family , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
Family legal aid barristers are so overworked and underpaid that many would leave the sector ‘in a heartbeat’, according to a Bar Council report

The report, 'System overload: a report into family legal aid', published this week, is based on research with 100 family legal aid barristers. It portrays a group of dedicated practitioners routinely working 70-hour weeks yet sometimes struggling to pay their bills as the fees earned are worth approximately half of what they were in 1996.

One barrister who has worked in the area for more then ten years described how she made £7 per hour for a piece of work that took her 15 hours. Another barrister said working ‘more hours for less money’ was ‘the only way we can keep the show on the road, in other words to safeguard the children who are at the heart of everything we do’.

Courts often lack heating, wheelchair access, drinking water or sinks with working taps. According to one barrister, the ’terrible’ condition of the court estate ‘feels quite reflective of how people are feeling’.

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said: ‘The people working within the system are collapsing and this cannot be ignored or tolerated.

‘The very real impact the financial and systemic pressure legal aid work is having on barristers’ health and wellbeing, made plain in this report, is extremely alarming. It is unacceptable that some family barristers are unable to support themselves and are being driven away from the profession at a time when legal aid representation is in desperate need.’

Mills called for an increase in legal aid rates, investment in the court estate and a government commitment to updating the fee schemes through an independent fee review body.

James Roberts KC, chair of the Family Law Bar Association, said the report ‘will make depressing reading for barristers working under the legal aid schemes but perhaps more importantly for their clients who are among the most vulnerable in our society.

‘Barristers in this field are effectively being paid half as much as they were in 1996 for twice the work. This is unsustainable.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll