header-logo header-logo

11 December 2025
Categories: Legal News , Family , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Long hours, stress & unsustainable fees at the Family Bar

Family legal aid barristers are so overworked and underpaid that many would leave the sector ‘in a heartbeat’, according to a Bar Council report

The report, 'System overload: a report into family legal aid', published this week, is based on research with 100 family legal aid barristers. It portrays a group of dedicated practitioners routinely working 70-hour weeks yet sometimes struggling to pay their bills as the fees earned are worth approximately half of what they were in 1996.

One barrister who has worked in the area for more then ten years described how she made £7 per hour for a piece of work that took her 15 hours. Another barrister said working ‘more hours for less money’ was ‘the only way we can keep the show on the road, in other words to safeguard the children who are at the heart of everything we do’.

Courts often lack heating, wheelchair access, drinking water or sinks with working taps. According to one barrister, the ’terrible’ condition of the court estate ‘feels quite reflective of how people are feeling’.

Bar Council chair Barbara Mills KC said: ‘The people working within the system are collapsing and this cannot be ignored or tolerated.

‘The very real impact the financial and systemic pressure legal aid work is having on barristers’ health and wellbeing, made plain in this report, is extremely alarming. It is unacceptable that some family barristers are unable to support themselves and are being driven away from the profession at a time when legal aid representation is in desperate need.’

Mills called for an increase in legal aid rates, investment in the court estate and a government commitment to updating the fee schemes through an independent fee review body.

James Roberts KC, chair of the Family Law Bar Association, said the report ‘will make depressing reading for barristers working under the legal aid schemes but perhaps more importantly for their clients who are among the most vulnerable in our society.

‘Barristers in this field are effectively being paid half as much as they were in 1996 for twice the work. This is unsustainable.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll