header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Long hours firms face talent shortfall in current climate

All work and no play culture upsetting work life balance for City law firm employees

City law firms need to reform their long hours culture or risk losing their competitive edge when recruiting the best talent.

New research, “Legal Lives: Retaining Talent through a Balanced Culture”, took place among fee-earners at 13 City law firms.

It identifies cultural barriers within law firms to balanced working, and recommends greater use of home and remote working. It found the perception that excellent client service is a barrier to balanced working is not reflected in reality, since clients are likely to support balanced working and recognise the benefits it brings.

Fee-earners who sought more balance wanted more control over non-work aspects of their lives but did not necessarily want to reduce their working hours.

Paul Lee, senior partner at Addleshaw Goddard, which commissioned the research with Working Families, says: “Work-life balance was, and continues to be, consistently identified as one of the most challenging issues affecting retention in the legal environment.”

Alison Pendleton, business director, Hays Legal, says: “From our point of view, it is one of the most important things.

Quality of work is the most important factor for candidates, and the next thing is work life balance. Salaries have gone up so much, even at a junior level, that money is no longer an issue, but people  want to know they will have a reasonable life.”

Candidates tend to migrate more commonly from large firms to smaller firms, where they can expect more flexibility, as opposed to moving in the other direction, she says.

“City firms say they are doing more, but in our experience they are still not keen on job-sharing or flexible working, unless it is a very valued member of the team.”

Issue: 7342 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

NLJ Career Profile: Ling Ong, London Market FOIL

Ling Ong, partner at Weightmans and president of London Market FOIL, discusses her biggest inspirations, the challenges of AI and the importance of tackling unconscious bias

DWF—Imogen Francis

DWF—Imogen Francis

Director and head of IP team joins in Birmingham

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Penningtons Manches Cooper—five promotions

Firm boosts partnership and costs practice with five senior promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll