header-logo header-logo

23 September 2016 / Elizabeth Slattery , Jo Broadbent
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Employment
printer mail-detail

A long & winding road?

nlj_7715_slattery

Elizabeth Slattery & Jo Broadbent discuss potential models for UK employment law post-Brexit

  • Three possible models for uncoupling from EU law include “Brexit-max”, “Brexit-lite” and “steady-state Brexit”.

We still do not know when Brexit will happen, or what form it will take, but Prime Minister May has said that the UK government will not trigger the formal withdrawal process until the start of 2017 (at the earliest). If the UK adopts something similar to the “Norwegian model”, and joins the EEA, there will be relatively little scope for changes to employment law. However, if the UK government negotiates a relationship with the EU outside the EEA, more significant changes are, in theory, possible. This article looks at three ways in which such changes might be brought about and some possible ramifications of each.

Three possible models

One option, referred to here as “Brexit-max”, would be a wholesale repeal of all EU derived law, including primary or secondary legislation. This option would clearly have a significant impact on employment law but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll