header-logo header-logo

23 September 2016 / Elizabeth Slattery , Jo Broadbent
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Employment
printer mail-detail

A long & winding road?

nlj_7715_slattery

Elizabeth Slattery & Jo Broadbent discuss potential models for UK employment law post-Brexit

  • Three possible models for uncoupling from EU law include “Brexit-max”, “Brexit-lite” and “steady-state Brexit”.

We still do not know when Brexit will happen, or what form it will take, but Prime Minister May has said that the UK government will not trigger the formal withdrawal process until the start of 2017 (at the earliest). If the UK adopts something similar to the “Norwegian model”, and joins the EEA, there will be relatively little scope for changes to employment law. However, if the UK government negotiates a relationship with the EU outside the EEA, more significant changes are, in theory, possible. This article looks at three ways in which such changes might be brought about and some possible ramifications of each.

Three possible models

One option, referred to here as “Brexit-max”, would be a wholesale repeal of all EU derived law, including primary or secondary legislation. This option would clearly have a significant impact on employment law but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll