header-logo header-logo

23 September 2016 / Elizabeth Slattery , Jo Broadbent
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Employment
printer mail-detail

A long & winding road?

nlj_7715_slattery

Elizabeth Slattery & Jo Broadbent discuss potential models for UK employment law post-Brexit

  • Three possible models for uncoupling from EU law include “Brexit-max”, “Brexit-lite” and “steady-state Brexit”.

We still do not know when Brexit will happen, or what form it will take, but Prime Minister May has said that the UK government will not trigger the formal withdrawal process until the start of 2017 (at the earliest). If the UK adopts something similar to the “Norwegian model”, and joins the EEA, there will be relatively little scope for changes to employment law. However, if the UK government negotiates a relationship with the EU outside the EEA, more significant changes are, in theory, possible. This article looks at three ways in which such changes might be brought about and some possible ramifications of each.

Three possible models

One option, referred to here as “Brexit-max”, would be a wholesale repeal of all EU derived law, including primary or secondary legislation. This option would clearly have a significant impact on employment law but

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll