header-logo header-logo

14 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Features , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Look, no costs estimate

 The requirement for a costs estimate with the allocation/directions questionnaire appears to have been scrapped...

 Q The requirement for a costs estimate with the allocation/directions questionnaire appears to have been scrapped in fast track cases. Is this a deliberate change?

A Yes. No doubt the logic behind the change was, with the extension of the scope of the low value road traffic portal scheme and with fast track fixed costs on the horizon, cost budgeting on the fast track would rapidly become an irrelevancy. In any event, even now, the court must apply proportionality to claims which by definition are under £25,000.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll