header-logo header-logo

Looking ahead to Brexit II

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Future relationship will be even more complex than divorce

The government should avoid drawing red lines but should set out clear objectives ahead of the next phase of Brexit negotiations, a thinktank report has advised.

The UK must use the Art 50 extension to focus on its long-term relationship with the EU, according to the Institute for Government report, Negotiating Brexit: Preparing for talks on the UK’s future relationship with the EU, published this week.

Tim Durrant, lead author, said: ‘Negotiations on our future relationship with the EU will be much more complex than the divorce.

‘They will also set the context for the UK’s relationship with other countries for decades to come. It is vital that the government uses the next months to develop a better understanding of how the EU will approach the next phase.’

The report looks at what went right and what went wrong in negotiations so far, concluding that the main problems were political: Cabinet could not agree on the shape of the future economic relationship, and politicians, particularly on the government backbenches, did not trust the UK’s official negotiators.

It describes the decision to create a dedicated Brexit department, DExEU, ‘misguided’ as it caused tensions with No10. Moreover, the government engaged Parliament late, alienated the devolved governments, and failed to make use of external expertise. Meanwhile, its ‘divide and rule’ diplomatic strategy meant member states rallied behind the European Commission negotiators.

For the next phase of negotiations, the institute recommends that the prime minister appoint a ministerial deputy in the Cabinet Office to oversee the day-to-day negotiations, taking that role away from DExEU. It suggests the government make better use of the Department for International Trade, engage Parliament and the devolved administrations early and consistently, allow more outside input into its plans, and rethink its approach to engaging member states.

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll