header-logo header-logo

Looking ahead to Brexit II

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Future relationship will be even more complex than divorce

The government should avoid drawing red lines but should set out clear objectives ahead of the next phase of Brexit negotiations, a thinktank report has advised.

The UK must use the Art 50 extension to focus on its long-term relationship with the EU, according to the Institute for Government report, Negotiating Brexit: Preparing for talks on the UK’s future relationship with the EU, published this week.

Tim Durrant, lead author, said: ‘Negotiations on our future relationship with the EU will be much more complex than the divorce.

‘They will also set the context for the UK’s relationship with other countries for decades to come. It is vital that the government uses the next months to develop a better understanding of how the EU will approach the next phase.’

The report looks at what went right and what went wrong in negotiations so far, concluding that the main problems were political: Cabinet could not agree on the shape of the future economic relationship, and politicians, particularly on the government backbenches, did not trust the UK’s official negotiators.

It describes the decision to create a dedicated Brexit department, DExEU, ‘misguided’ as it caused tensions with No10. Moreover, the government engaged Parliament late, alienated the devolved governments, and failed to make use of external expertise. Meanwhile, its ‘divide and rule’ diplomatic strategy meant member states rallied behind the European Commission negotiators.

For the next phase of negotiations, the institute recommends that the prime minister appoint a ministerial deputy in the Cabinet Office to oversee the day-to-day negotiations, taking that role away from DExEU. It suggests the government make better use of the Department for International Trade, engage Parliament and the devolved administrations early and consistently, allow more outside input into its plans, and rethink its approach to engaging member states.

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll