header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Lord Neuberger on assisted dying

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
19 September 2025 / William Raven
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Health
printer mail-detail
230092
The judge & former president of the Supreme Court talks to William Raven about his views on the Terminally Ill Adults Bill

Lord Neuberger, by his own admission, has ‘for many years been interested in the topic of assisted dying’. Liberalising the law on assisted dying is a question he has often considered—as a law lord in R (on the application of Purdy) v DPP [2009] UKHL 45, [2009] 4 All ER 1147, and in the Supreme Court in R (on the application of Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2014] UKSC 38, [2014] 3 All ER 843. When we met on a late-June morning, a few days after the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed its third reading in the House of Commons, it was an issue I was keen to raise. 

Liberalising the law

‘For a long time, I’ve been in favour of liberalising the law,’ Lord Neuberger said. ‘I don’t go to the House of Lords very often, but [in 2021] there was a motion about

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Burges Salmon—Lillian Mackenzie

Burges Salmon—Lillian Mackenzie

Projects and infrastructure team appoints partner in Edinburgh

Gateley Legal—Brian Dowling

Gateley Legal—Brian Dowling

Partner joins residential development team in Reading

DWF—Don Brown

DWF—Don Brown

Banking and finance team expands with strategic partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Civil tweaks & courtroom quirks
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
NLJ this week: Righting Libor wrongs
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
NLJ this week: Gaslighting & post-separation assets
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
NLJ this week: Back to (costs) basics
David Bailey-Vella of Davis Woolfe and chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers explores the new costs budgeting light pilot scheme in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Tackling CPS non-disclosure
Writing in NLJ this week, Nick Brett and Vicky Lankester of Brett Wilson dissect the chronic failures of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in meeting disclosure obligations. From the Post Office scandal to the collapsed trial of Liam Allan, they highlight how systemic neglect has led to wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll