header-logo header-logo

Lords to review Bribery Act

25 June 2018
Categories: Legal News , Bribery , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Peers have issued a call for evidence on the Bribery Act 2010

The House of Lords Select Committee on the Act is looking for views and opinions for its post-legislative scrutiny inquiry into the legislation, which created the crimes of giving and receiving bribes, bribing foreign public officials and failing to prevent bribery. Prior to the Act, the law of bribery had remained substantially the same for nearly a century.

The majority of corrupt conduct is now prosecuted under the Act, which came into force on 1 July 2011, and some cases have already reached the Court of Appeal.

The inquiry will look at the effectiveness of the Act; whether there has been stricter prosecution of corrupt conduct, a higher conviction rate, and a reduction in such conduct; and the impact of the Act on small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs).

It will also look at the subject of deferred prosecution agreements in relation to bribery; inquire whether the statutory guidance on the Act is clear and well understood; and ask if the Act is successfully deterring bribery both in the UK and abroad.

 Lord Saville, chair of the committee, said: ‘Concerns over whether the Bribery Act 2010 is effective need to be examined now.

‘The committee seeks to assess the effectiveness of the legislation and the impact it is having, as nearly all corrupt conduct is now prosecuted under it. The committee will welcome submissions from people, organisations or businesses with experience of the Bribery Act 2010, and urges any persons and bodies that would like to be involved to send us their views.’

The deadline for submissions is 31 July 2018.

Categories: Legal News , Bribery , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll