header-logo header-logo

Lords to review Bribery Act

25 June 2018
Categories: Legal News , Bribery , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Peers have issued a call for evidence on the Bribery Act 2010

The House of Lords Select Committee on the Act is looking for views and opinions for its post-legislative scrutiny inquiry into the legislation, which created the crimes of giving and receiving bribes, bribing foreign public officials and failing to prevent bribery. Prior to the Act, the law of bribery had remained substantially the same for nearly a century.

The majority of corrupt conduct is now prosecuted under the Act, which came into force on 1 July 2011, and some cases have already reached the Court of Appeal.

The inquiry will look at the effectiveness of the Act; whether there has been stricter prosecution of corrupt conduct, a higher conviction rate, and a reduction in such conduct; and the impact of the Act on small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs).

It will also look at the subject of deferred prosecution agreements in relation to bribery; inquire whether the statutory guidance on the Act is clear and well understood; and ask if the Act is successfully deterring bribery both in the UK and abroad.

 Lord Saville, chair of the committee, said: ‘Concerns over whether the Bribery Act 2010 is effective need to be examined now.

‘The committee seeks to assess the effectiveness of the legislation and the impact it is having, as nearly all corrupt conduct is now prosecuted under it. The committee will welcome submissions from people, organisations or businesses with experience of the Bribery Act 2010, and urges any persons and bodies that would like to be involved to send us their views.’

The deadline for submissions is 31 July 2018.

Categories: Legal News , Bribery , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll