header-logo header-logo

25 June 2018
Categories: Legal News , Bribery , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Lords to review Bribery Act

Peers have issued a call for evidence on the Bribery Act 2010

The House of Lords Select Committee on the Act is looking for views and opinions for its post-legislative scrutiny inquiry into the legislation, which created the crimes of giving and receiving bribes, bribing foreign public officials and failing to prevent bribery. Prior to the Act, the law of bribery had remained substantially the same for nearly a century.

The majority of corrupt conduct is now prosecuted under the Act, which came into force on 1 July 2011, and some cases have already reached the Court of Appeal.

The inquiry will look at the effectiveness of the Act; whether there has been stricter prosecution of corrupt conduct, a higher conviction rate, and a reduction in such conduct; and the impact of the Act on small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs).

It will also look at the subject of deferred prosecution agreements in relation to bribery; inquire whether the statutory guidance on the Act is clear and well understood; and ask if the Act is successfully deterring bribery both in the UK and abroad.

 Lord Saville, chair of the committee, said: ‘Concerns over whether the Bribery Act 2010 is effective need to be examined now.

‘The committee seeks to assess the effectiveness of the legislation and the impact it is having, as nearly all corrupt conduct is now prosecuted under it. The committee will welcome submissions from people, organisations or businesses with experience of the Bribery Act 2010, and urges any persons and bodies that would like to be involved to send us their views.’

The deadline for submissions is 31 July 2018.

Categories: Legal News , Bribery , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll