header-logo header-logo

17 May 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

For love or money?

Seamus Burns considers the legal and ethical dilemmas of egg donation

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) agreed in February to allow women to donate their eggs for research purposes. The chief executive of HFEA, Angela McNab, commenting on this significant change of policy in a statement on 21 February 2007, said that HFEA had only agreed to this change of policy “provided that there are strong safeguards in place to ensure the women are properly informed of the risks of the procedure, and are properly protected from coercion”. The decision to donate should be prompted primarily by altruism and not motivated by the desire to be financially rewarded, and axiomatically needs to be a voluntary decision. As McNab added:

“Women will not be paid for donating their eggs. Researchers will have to follow the same system as donation for treatment; donors can only claim back the expenses that they have actually incurred. There has never been any question of women receiving payment for donating their eggs for research at any stage of our

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll