header-logo header-logo

01 June 2012 / Christopher Warenius
Issue: 7516 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Love thy neighbour?

The courts take a dim view of money being wasted in disputes between neighbours, observes Christopher Warenius

Disputes between tenants within blocks of flats are not uncommon and noise complaints are often the cause. In a large block of flats, leases between tenants will usually be in a standard form and contain covenants with the landlord “which are also expressed to be for the benefit of the other tenants” to observe and perform the regulations governing life in the block. Often the landlord covenants with the tenant in each case that it will enforce tenant covenants against other tenants. The case of Faidi v Elliot Corporation [2012] EWCA Civ 287, [2012] All ER (D) 123 (Mar) concerned the common problem of noise insulation and flooring—in this case in the rather rarefied environment of Eaton Mansions in London.

Flat facts

The freehold of Eaton Mansions was owned by the Grosvenor Estates (Grosvenor) and the head leasehold interest was owned by Eaton Mansions (Westminster) Limited (EMW), which is a management company owned by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll