header-logo header-logo

Low values, high transfers

21 September 2011
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Some county courts are following a policy of automatically transferring low value road traffic damages claims...

Some county courts are following a policy of automatically transferring low value road traffic damages claims to the claimant’s local court, irrespective of whether there is to be a determination at a hearing or on the papers and irrespective of where the claimant’s solicitors practice. This can be particularly inconvenient where, for example the claimant wishes to send a legal representative to the hearing and his solicitors bulk issue in their local court. Was automatic transfer out intended?  

Bulk issue in a particular court does not imply bulk determination of the claims by that court, which may very well not have the necessary judicial resources. Where a claim requiring judicial attention is issued in a court with which the parties have no connection, it will generally be transferred to a court more convenient for them to attend.

The location of the claimant’s solicitors is not a relevant consideration. A transfer may be thought unnecessary if there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll