header-logo header-logo

21 September 2011
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Low values, high transfers

Some county courts are following a policy of automatically transferring low value road traffic damages claims...

Some county courts are following a policy of automatically transferring low value road traffic damages claims to the claimant’s local court, irrespective of whether there is to be a determination at a hearing or on the papers and irrespective of where the claimant’s solicitors practice. This can be particularly inconvenient where, for example the claimant wishes to send a legal representative to the hearing and his solicitors bulk issue in their local court. Was automatic transfer out intended?  

Bulk issue in a particular court does not imply bulk determination of the claims by that court, which may very well not have the necessary judicial resources. Where a claim requiring judicial attention is issued in a court with which the parties have no connection, it will generally be transferred to a court more convenient for them to attend.

The location of the claimant’s solicitors is not a relevant consideration. A transfer may be thought unnecessary if there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll