header-logo header-logo

Low values, high transfers

21 September 2011
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Some county courts are following a policy of automatically transferring low value road traffic damages claims...

Some county courts are following a policy of automatically transferring low value road traffic damages claims to the claimant’s local court, irrespective of whether there is to be a determination at a hearing or on the papers and irrespective of where the claimant’s solicitors practice. This can be particularly inconvenient where, for example the claimant wishes to send a legal representative to the hearing and his solicitors bulk issue in their local court. Was automatic transfer out intended?  

Bulk issue in a particular court does not imply bulk determination of the claims by that court, which may very well not have the necessary judicial resources. Where a claim requiring judicial attention is issued in a court with which the parties have no connection, it will generally be transferred to a court more convenient for them to attend.

The location of the claimant’s solicitors is not a relevant consideration. A transfer may be thought unnecessary if there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll