header-logo header-logo

LSB lists fine potential

14 August 2009
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

The Legal Services Board (LSB), the super-regulator which oversees the Law Society and Bar Council, has set a maximum potential fine of £28m for the Law Society if it does not reach its targets on complaints-handling.

The Bar Council could be fined up to £10m. The figure of £28m is reached by multiplying each of the 112,500 practising solicitors in England and Wales by £250. The LSB could also impose a fine of £10m, or a levy based on a rate of £5,000 per entity regulated.

The potential fines are set out in the LSB consultation paper, Compliance and Enforcement. However, the LSB acknowledges that “it would not be appropriate for a failure...to lead to that regulatory arm being further disadvantaged by a budgetary reduction”.

Russell Wallman, director of government relations at the Law Society, says: “The Legal Services Board’s proposals about maximum level of fines are misconceived.

They draw a false analogy between utility companies—which are commercial bodies operating for profit—and the regulation of legal services, which is a non-commercial activity carried out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll