header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

LSC crime packs published

News

Application packs for the new general criminal contract (GCC), which will apply to legal aid firms across England and Wales from next year, have been published by the Legal Services Commission (LSC).

Any providers—including current GCC contract holders—who want to carry out new criminal legal aid work from 14 January 2008 must apply.
The LSC says there will be no surprises in the new GCC, claiming it has consulted on everything in it “other than the necessary changes to take account of legal developments”. The amendment clauses, it says, reflect its understanding of the law following Mr Justice Beatson’s judgment on the unified contract in R (on the application of the Law Society) v Legal Services Commission.

Rodney Warren, director of the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association, urges all criminal law solicitors to read the documentation thoroughly.
He says: “No one will want to sign any documentation until the content and, much more importantly, the ramification of the contract and system changes are thoroughly understood.

“The CLSA is arranging a series of regional meetings…and there is to be a national meeting on 23 October at Central Hall, Westminster. This meeting is sure to be a very important milestone. We would urge all criminal lawyers to attend.”

The main difference in the new contract is the way firms will be paid for police station work. The fixed fee level has been set by area, so that in areas outside the main cities an average provider with an average caseload will receive the same income as it does now.

The January 2008 contract reflects the current position on magistrates’ court fees after the amendments made to the fee structures in April 2007. Other changes include: expansion of the defence solicitor call centre to own client work; expansion of Criminal Defence Service (CDS) Direct to those elements of own client work suitable for telephone-only advice; and the introduction of the very high cost case contracting panel to run for 18 months. Crown court criminal aid fees are expected to be published next week.

The LSC believes most criminal legal aid providers will sign the contracts and that it will have sufficient firms to deliver the CDS.

Derek Hill, CDS director, says: “As with the unified contract earlier this year when 95% of existing civil legal aid providers signed, we expect that most firms will see it as in their interest to sign, as well as in the interest of their clients.”

 

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll