header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Legal News , Professional negligence , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Major penalty for miner case

Miners’ compensation solicitors struck off in breach of Solicitors Practice Rules

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has ordered James Beresford and Douglas Smith of Beresfords Solicitors, Doncaster, to be struck off and to pay all costs.

The two solicitors came under fire over their handling of a government compensation scheme for sick and elderly
miners’ compensation claims, from which they made multimillion pound fortunes.

Last month’s hearing found eight of eleven allegations against Beresford and Smith proven, and a ninth partially proven. Th e solicitors were found to have breached Solicitors Practice Rules regarding confl ict of interest between their own interest and the interest of their clients,
to have failed to act in the best interests of their clients, to have entered into a sham agreement with the Union of
Democratic Mineworkers, to have shared their professional fees with a non-solicitor, to have improperly released confi dential
information and to have failed to give their clients sufficient information about costs.

Beresfords Solicitors said, in a statement: “Jim Beresford and Doug Smith continue to strenuously

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll