header-logo header-logo

A make-believe world

25 March 2016 / Charles Auld , Kate Harrington
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7692_auld

Costs budgeting simply doesn’t work, say Charles Auld & Kate Harrington

All civil litigation incurs cost; this may be sums paid to lawyers to conduct that litigation; the hours worked by an in-house employee retained specifically for, say, debt collection or the cost of the time spent by a litigant in person. If litigants cannot recover their costs from other parties this can have undesirable results. A claimant can pursue a completely unmeritorious claim with a view to persuading the defendant that it would be cheaper to pay him something in settlement than take the matter to trial. Perhaps of more significance, a no-costs system can prevent a claimant who has a good claim for a non-financial remedy, eg possession of land, but who is impecunious, from pursuing his action at all.

Successful litigants in England and Wales are, at least prima facie, entitled to recover their legal costs from the unsuccessful party, but there is a limit on what can be recovered. As Victorian

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll