header-logo header-logo

25 March 2016 / Charles Auld , Kate Harrington
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

A make-believe world

001_nlj_7692_auld

Costs budgeting simply doesn’t work, say Charles Auld & Kate Harrington

All civil litigation incurs cost; this may be sums paid to lawyers to conduct that litigation; the hours worked by an in-house employee retained specifically for, say, debt collection or the cost of the time spent by a litigant in person. If litigants cannot recover their costs from other parties this can have undesirable results. A claimant can pursue a completely unmeritorious claim with a view to persuading the defendant that it would be cheaper to pay him something in settlement than take the matter to trial. Perhaps of more significance, a no-costs system can prevent a claimant who has a good claim for a non-financial remedy, eg possession of land, but who is impecunious, from pursuing his action at all.

Successful litigants in England and Wales are, at least prima facie, entitled to recover their legal costs from the unsuccessful party, but there is a limit on what can be recovered. As Victorian

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll