header-logo header-logo

25 March 2016 / Charles Auld , Kate Harrington
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

A make-believe world

001_nlj_7692_auld

Costs budgeting simply doesn’t work, say Charles Auld & Kate Harrington

All civil litigation incurs cost; this may be sums paid to lawyers to conduct that litigation; the hours worked by an in-house employee retained specifically for, say, debt collection or the cost of the time spent by a litigant in person. If litigants cannot recover their costs from other parties this can have undesirable results. A claimant can pursue a completely unmeritorious claim with a view to persuading the defendant that it would be cheaper to pay him something in settlement than take the matter to trial. Perhaps of more significance, a no-costs system can prevent a claimant who has a good claim for a non-financial remedy, eg possession of land, but who is impecunious, from pursuing his action at all.

Successful litigants in England and Wales are, at least prima facie, entitled to recover their legal costs from the unsuccessful party, but there is a limit on what can be recovered. As Victorian

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll