header-logo header-logo

19 September 2014 / Donald Lambert
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Make or break

property_lambert

Donald Lambert discusses not just any break clause, but an M&S break clause

In Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas [2014] EWCA Civ 603, [2014] All ER (D) 147 (May), Marks & Spencer Plc (M&S) held leases of four floors of offices in Paddington. The leases ran until 2 February 2018 but M&S had the benefit of break clauses in all of the leases operable as at 24 January 2012 or 24 January 2014.

The break clauses were subject to a number of conditions, the most important of which were:

  • on the break date there were to be no arrears of the basic rent; and
  • to exercise the 2012 break, the tenant was also to make a payment to the landlord of approximately £900,000 plus VAT “on or prior to” the break date (the break sum).

The break sum was approximately the basic yearly rent for one floor. Clearly the tenant would save substantial sums by correctly operating the break clauses.

M&S made all payments required to exercise the breaks including

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll