header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Making a connection

Smith has forced the courts to re-evaluate the concept of control,says Brent McDonald

In Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2009] UKHL 27, ALL ER [2009] All ER (D) 170 (May) Mrs Smith was a carer and driver working for the defendant. On the day of her accident, as she had done for eight years previously, she attended at a private house to convey the occupant, who was a wheelchair user, into the minibus. To do so she had to wheel the claimant down a wooden ramp which had been installed at the client’s home by the NHS.

Although the council had carried out an inspection of the ramp (which, it was agreed, would not have revealed a defect) and asked Mrs Smith to visually inspect the ramp before using it, they had no right to call for its removal, to repair it or otherwise exercise control over it.

Due to rotting which could not be seen, the edge of the ramp gave way as the claimant crossed it, causing the claimant to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll