header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Making a connection

Charles Pigott illustrates the potential reach of the test for vicarious liability

In Maga v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256 the Court of Appeal has concluded that the Archdiocese was vicariously liable for acts of child abuse committed by one of its priests, even though the claimant was not a Roman Catholic and had nothing to do with the church to which the priest was attached.
The claim arose from acts of abuse committed in the mid 70s by Father Clonan, a priest working at a Roman Catholic church in Coventry.

Father Clonan was in his early 30s when he began work at the church. He focused particularly on youth work, running discos and social clubs and coaching a number of football teams. He lived at the presbytery next to the church, which was owned by the Archdiocese and housed a number of other priests. He had additional income from running a construction company and owned a number of houses in the Coventry

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll