header-logo header-logo

27 March 2008 / Elizabeth Davidson
Issue: 7314 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Making the cut

What does it take to reach the rank of Queen’s Counsel? Elizabeth Davidson investigates

Some chambers produce more silks than others. Or so it would seem from the last two rounds of the Queen’s Counsel selection process, where high-scoring chambers in 2006 have tended to repeat their success in 2008.

Essex Court
, for example, produced the most new silks in 2006 and 2008. Civil and commercial sets Brick Court Chambers, Maitland Chambers and , and criminal set , each provided three new silks this year, and also performed well in the previous round. After producing six new silks last time, 7 King’s Bench had two more in the latest round. So, what’s their secret? The highly sought after award is given to candidates who can demonstrate excellence in advocacy (written or oral) in the higher courts. As well as the prestige factor, the award paves the way to significantly higher earnings.

Gary Oliver, senior clerk at Blackstone Chambers, which produced three

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll