header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 158, Issue 7314

27 March 2008
IN THIS ISSUE

D v H [2008] EWHC 559 (Fam), [2008] All ER (D) 286 (Mar)

News In Brief

Accomodating 16 - and 17 - year olds, Intentional homelessness, Tolerated tresspassers

The NLJ Column

Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (Amendment) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/656)

Roger Smith examines the Legal Services Commission's proposals for competitive tendering

Partner on retirement repayment, capital, annuity

Byron James takes the law into his own hands with the modern application of an age-old remedy

Lapsed warning, redundancy, EU Industrial action

The Budget will have made the chancellor few new friends at home or abroad, says Peter Vaines

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll