header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 March 2008 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7314 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Love me tender?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Roger Smith examines the Legal Services Commission's proposals for competitive tendering

“Keep the cost of legal aid down to £2bn. Squeeze the criminal budget. Get the lawyers fighting each other rather than us. Make them bid for their cases.” Thus might Jack Straw, in reality rather more urbane, have instructed Sir Michael Bichard, chair of the Legal Services Commission (LSC). In public speeches, Straw reveals he knows but one thing about legal aid: it costs too much for a man with new prisons to build.

Blind loyalty to external instruction might explain the appalling quality of the consequent paper Best Value Tendering of Criminal Defence Services published by Sir Michael’s commission in 2007. Its standard has been widely criticised, not least in this publication (wsee NLJ, 1 February 2008, p 157 and NLJ, 22 February 2008, p 273). If the commission were interested in raising its game in this area, the Legal Complaints Service has recently supplied a model. Its

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll