header-logo header-logo

Making room for AI in arbitration

208708
As the EU Artificial Intelligence Act rolls out, Gustavo Moser sets out a practical checklist for managing AI usage in arbitration 
  • The EU AI Act introduces comprehensive compliance standards that will influence international arbitration practices.
  • Establishing robust arbitration agreements and procedural orders will serve as guardrails for arbitral proceedings, effectively communicating the ground rules for managing AI’s role within the arbitration landscape.
  • With penalties for non-compliance set to begin in August 2025, timely adaptation is imperative for maintaining the integrity of the arbitration process.

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (the ‘AI Act’), which became law on 1 August 2024, established regulations that will reshape the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) across various sectors, including international arbitration. Most provisions will apply from 2025/26.

As the EU moves forward with implementing this legislation, arbitration stakeholders must navigate its complexities and ensure compliance with the AI Act’s robust standards. While arbitrators may feel the most immediate impact, party counsel must also grasp the implications for their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll