header-logo header-logo

30 June 2017 / Camilla Fusco
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Making sure your pre-marital agreement travels well

Drafting pre- or post-marital agreements with an international dimension can be a tricky business. Camilla Fusco offers some tips

  • Nine points to consider when drafting marital agreements with an international dimension.
  • Although the impact of Brexit on international family law is still unclear it is likely that jurisdiction clauses in marital agreements will become increasingly significant in the future.

In an increasingly cosmopolitan world, family lawyers are often required to advise clients from a global perspective. This is especially relevant when drafting a pre- marital or post marital agreement with an international dimension.

There are various reasons why international considerations can arise, for example where the couple have a connection with a foreign country or if they intend to move abroad in the future. Alternatively, they may own assets abroad or be foreign nationals living here on an expatriate basis. The following summarises the position in England and Wales concerning marital agreements and the issues which need to be considered when drafting a marital agreement with an international perspective.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll