header-logo header-logo

Making sure your pre-marital agreement travels well

30 June 2017 / Camilla Fusco
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Drafting pre- or post-marital agreements with an international dimension can be a tricky business. Camilla Fusco offers some tips

  • Nine points to consider when drafting marital agreements with an international dimension.
  • Although the impact of Brexit on international family law is still unclear it is likely that jurisdiction clauses in marital agreements will become increasingly significant in the future.

In an increasingly cosmopolitan world, family lawyers are often required to advise clients from a global perspective. This is especially relevant when drafting a pre- marital or post marital agreement with an international dimension.

There are various reasons why international considerations can arise, for example where the couple have a connection with a foreign country or if they intend to move abroad in the future. Alternatively, they may own assets abroad or be foreign nationals living here on an expatriate basis. The following summarises the position in England and Wales concerning marital agreements and the issues which need to be considered when drafting a marital agreement with an international perspective.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll