header-logo header-logo

Making sure your pre-marital agreement travels well

30 June 2017 / Camilla Fusco
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Drafting pre- or post-marital agreements with an international dimension can be a tricky business. Camilla Fusco offers some tips

  • Nine points to consider when drafting marital agreements with an international dimension.
  • Although the impact of Brexit on international family law is still unclear it is likely that jurisdiction clauses in marital agreements will become increasingly significant in the future.

In an increasingly cosmopolitan world, family lawyers are often required to advise clients from a global perspective. This is especially relevant when drafting a pre- marital or post marital agreement with an international dimension.

There are various reasons why international considerations can arise, for example where the couple have a connection with a foreign country or if they intend to move abroad in the future. Alternatively, they may own assets abroad or be foreign nationals living here on an expatriate basis. The following summarises the position in England and Wales concerning marital agreements and the issues which need to be considered when drafting a marital agreement with an international perspective.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll