header-logo header-logo

A man on the edge

30 April 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Opinion , Local government , Public , Tax
printer mail-detail

A post-Budget lament by Peter Vaines

You have to feel sorry for Alistair Darling. What could the poor chap do. Raise taxes? Reduce taxes? Increase public spending? Reduce public spending? He would be damned if he did nothing at all. In the end, I am not sure what he did. We had 93 press releases and a mountain of other documents which I suppose just gave him something to deflect the inevitable criticism. David Cameron had of course already written his speech and had his righteous indignation ready to roll, no matter what Mr Darling said. I must say watching Gordon Brown smirking was the least edifying aspect of the whole afternoon. The only person who seems entitled to smirk is Tony Blair who is no doubt sitting in his study at Yale doing his impersonation of Louis XV saying “Après moi, le deluge”.

What about me?
The first question anybody asks about a Budget is how it affects them. Will my tax go up? If not, then it is a good

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll