header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Opinion , Local government , Public , Tax
printer mail-detail

A man on the edge

A post-Budget lament by Peter Vaines

You have to feel sorry for Alistair Darling. What could the poor chap do. Raise taxes? Reduce taxes? Increase public spending? Reduce public spending? He would be damned if he did nothing at all. In the end, I am not sure what he did. We had 93 press releases and a mountain of other documents which I suppose just gave him something to deflect the inevitable criticism. David Cameron had of course already written his speech and had his righteous indignation ready to roll, no matter what Mr Darling said. I must say watching Gordon Brown smirking was the least edifying aspect of the whole afternoon. The only person who seems entitled to smirk is Tony Blair who is no doubt sitting in his study at Yale doing his impersonation of Louis XV saying “Après moi, le deluge”.

What about me?
The first question anybody asks about a Budget is how it affects them. Will my tax go up? If not, then it is a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll