header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Managing change at the top

nlj_7799_walsh

Automatic disqualification rules will soon apply to charity senior management. Bethan Walsh reports.

  • From 1 August 2018, new rules come into effect making the automatic disqualification rules that currently apply to charity trustees also apply to senior management positions in charities.

The current rules governing charities only disqualify certain people from acting as charity trustees and in this regard the rules currently only apply to trustee positions. A disqualified person cannot act as a charity trustee unless they have received a waiver from the Charity Commission. The reasons for a disqualification relate to bankruptcy and crimes involving dishonesty or deception.

A trustee is a person responsible for governing a charity and directing how it is managed and run. Collectively, they may be referred to as the trustees, the board, the management committee, governors, directors, or something else. It is the function that matters not the title. The people who have ultimate control of a charity will be the charity trustees regardless of the name they are given by the charity’s governing document.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll