header-logo header-logo

Managing change at the top

28 June 2018 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail
nlj_7799_walsh

Automatic disqualification rules will soon apply to charity senior management. Bethan Walsh reports.

  • From 1 August 2018, new rules come into effect making the automatic disqualification rules that currently apply to charity trustees also apply to senior management positions in charities.

The current rules governing charities only disqualify certain people from acting as charity trustees and in this regard the rules currently only apply to trustee positions. A disqualified person cannot act as a charity trustee unless they have received a waiver from the Charity Commission. The reasons for a disqualification relate to bankruptcy and crimes involving dishonesty or deception.

A trustee is a person responsible for governing a charity and directing how it is managed and run. Collectively, they may be referred to as the trustees, the board, the management committee, governors, directors, or something else. It is the function that matters not the title. The people who have ultimate control of a charity will be the charity trustees regardless of the name they are given by the charity’s governing document.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll