header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Managing change at the top

nlj_7799_walsh

Automatic disqualification rules will soon apply to charity senior management. Bethan Walsh reports.

  • From 1 August 2018, new rules come into effect making the automatic disqualification rules that currently apply to charity trustees also apply to senior management positions in charities.

The current rules governing charities only disqualify certain people from acting as charity trustees and in this regard the rules currently only apply to trustee positions. A disqualified person cannot act as a charity trustee unless they have received a waiver from the Charity Commission. The reasons for a disqualification relate to bankruptcy and crimes involving dishonesty or deception.

A trustee is a person responsible for governing a charity and directing how it is managed and run. Collectively, they may be referred to as the trustees, the board, the management committee, governors, directors, or something else. It is the function that matters not the title. The people who have ultimate control of a charity will be the charity trustees regardless of the name they are given by the charity’s governing document.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll