header-logo header-logo

Managing change at the top

28 June 2018 / Bethan Walsh
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail
nlj_7799_walsh

Automatic disqualification rules will soon apply to charity senior management. Bethan Walsh reports.

  • From 1 August 2018, new rules come into effect making the automatic disqualification rules that currently apply to charity trustees also apply to senior management positions in charities.

The current rules governing charities only disqualify certain people from acting as charity trustees and in this regard the rules currently only apply to trustee positions. A disqualified person cannot act as a charity trustee unless they have received a waiver from the Charity Commission. The reasons for a disqualification relate to bankruptcy and crimes involving dishonesty or deception.

A trustee is a person responsible for governing a charity and directing how it is managed and run. Collectively, they may be referred to as the trustees, the board, the management committee, governors, directors, or something else. It is the function that matters not the title. The people who have ultimate control of a charity will be the charity trustees regardless of the name they are given by the charity’s governing document.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll