header-logo header-logo

Managing the credit crunch

04 September 2008 / Jeremy Nixon
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Part 2: Jeremy Nixon reviews the law in relation to mitigation of loss

It is well established that an individual who has been unfairly or wrongfully dismissed by their employer is under a duty to take reasonable steps to mitigate their loss. The question of loss is often a key battle ground in any litigation, particularly where the parties are discussing the possibility of a settlement. Frequently, employees have high expectations in terms of the amount they are likely to recover. On the other hand, employers often prefer to focus on the question of loss particularly where their case in relation to liability is not strong. The employer's primary aim here will be to inject what they regard as some realism into the employee's expectations.
General principles

A claimant in a wrongful or unfair dismissal case is required to give credit for any sums received following their dismissal either by way of social security payments or earnings. Further, the claimant cannot recover damages for any losses which he could reasonably have avoided. The duty

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll