header-logo header-logo

To the manor born

12 October 2012 / Christopher Jessel
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
105659208_4

Christopher Jessel summarises the forthcoming changes to manorial rights

Manorial rights will cease to be overriding interests in registered land on 12 October 2013. Such rights, particularly to minerals, can be valuable. If they are not already mentioned on the register of title to the land subject to them, a person who is entitled to the benefit and who wishes to preserve them will need to take action. Correspondingly, as the burden can affect the value of land subject to such claims, the owner of that land who disputes the rights will need to be ready to resist them.

Overriding interests

Overriding interests are rights which bind land even though they are not mentioned on the register of title. The policy of the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002) was to reduce the number of them so that as far as possible anyone who looked at the register could find out what rights the land was subject to. Lists of overriding interests are set out in LRA 2002 in Sch

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll