header-logo header-logo

13 May 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7465 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

March of the big brand

Part 2: Jon Robins continues his predictions on how deregulation will affect the legal services market

The purpose of the reform agenda of the Legal Services Act 2007 is to unleash the powers of competition thus enabling consumers to have greater choice and access to improved services. However, if the only criterion for exercising choice is price, as distinct from judgments made on an understanding as to quality, then there’s a problem.

“Quality” in legal services is a slippery and elusive concept, as was made clear from the three comments below taken from a recent report by the Legal Services Consumer Panel (Quality in Legal Services, November 2010).
 

  • Consumer A: “You only buy or sell a house once or twice in your lifetime…you’ve no yardstick to measure them by.”
  • Consumer B: “They’re all solicitors and qualified to a similar level, and so it doesn’t matter whether they’re charging you £200 or £800.”
  • Consumer C: “We put ourselves in their hands and because they’re qualified and they’re professionals, we just hope
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll