header-logo header-logo

Marked disparity in the way women and men perceive issue of gender equality

08 March 2018
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Unconscious bias, the unacceptable work-life balance demanded to reach senior levels, resistance to flexible working and traditional male-oriented routes to promotion are the biggest barriers to career progression.

More than half of 7,781 people responding to the Law Society’s Women in the Law survey— the largest ever international survey of women in the law— identified unconscious bias as a barrier. However, only 11% said unconscious bias training was being carried out in their organisation.

Best practice ways to improve careers equality were: flexible working; networking opportunities; mentoring and sponsorship; engaging men in the equality debate and encouraging shared parental leave; increased visibility of women at senior levels in the law; and role modelling family-friendly working practices, including through speaking at informal and formal events.

There was a marked disparity in the way women and men perceive the issue of gender equality. The respondents to the survey, published this week on International Women’s Day, included 5,758 women and 554 men (the rest either did not declare or said they were ‘other’). Nearly three-quarters of the men but less than half the women agreed there had been progress on gender equality in the past five years.

An overwhelming 91% of respondents said flexible working is critical to improving diversity. However, only half of the respondents work in an organisation where flexible working is in place. Moreover, while 60% said they were aware of a gender pay gap in their workplace, only 16% saw visible steps being taken to address the disparity.

‘While more and more women are becoming lawyers, this shift is not yet reflected at more senior levels in the profession,’ said Law Society vice president Christina Blacklaws.

‘Our survey and a wider programme of work during my presidency in 2018-19 seek to understand progress, barriers and support remedies. Unconscious bias in the legal profession is the most commonly identified barrier to career progression for women, while flexible working is seen as a remedy by an overwhelming 91% of respondents to our survey.

‘Interestingly, while half of all respondents said they thought there had been progress on gender equality over the last five years, there was a significant difference in perception by gender with 74% of men reporting progress in gender equality compared to only 48% of women.’

Meanwhile, the Douglas Scott 2018 Salary Survey, published this week, identifies flexi-time as the most sought-after benefit. However, only one in five of the 3,000 lawyer respondents had flexi-time as part of their benefits package.

Women accounted for two-thirds of the 3,000 legal professionals who took part (82% solicitors and 11% legal executives). Londoners worked a 44-hour week on average, compared to 41 hours in the Midlands (although Midlands lawyers were the least satisfied with their jobs, and only one third were happy with their pay and benefits).

 

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll