header-logo header-logo

12 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Market access post-Brexit

A framework to agree reciprocal market access in financial and professional services between the UK and EU post-Brexit has been developed jointly by a law firm and advisory group.

The framework would be underpinned by mutual recognition of each other’s regulatory and supervisory regimes, enabling firms to continue trading with minimal disruption to their customers. It has been developed by Hogan Lovells and the International Regulatory Strategy Group (IRSG), and is set out in a paper published this week, Mutual recognition—a basis for market access after Brexit.

The paper covers criteria for access, mechanisms for maintaining regulatory alignment and dispute resolution. It suggests basing criteria for access on existing global standards such as those set by the Basel Committee on Banking Standards. A joint UK-EU forum could be established to monitor regulation and supervision, including input into proposed new legislation. It sets out a range of dispute resolution models.

Rachel Kent, partner at Hogan Lovells, said: “Earlier this year the IRSG concluded that the focus of the government’s Brexit negotiations should be on delivering a bespoke UK-EU deal rather than reforming or adapting existing EU third country equivalence regimes for market access. This follow up report develops how a bespoke arrangement could work in practise.”

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll