header-logo header-logo

Mast Rights

10 January 2008 / Alistair Craig
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Features , Public , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Alistair Craig considers the compulsory powers to acquire and retain mobile phone masts

 

Many owners who have entered licence agreements or contracted out tenancies for the siting of mobile phone masts and electronic communications equipment now find themselves unable to secure their removal by virtue of operators’ compulsory powers to acquire and retain sites.

 

Instead of providing a national transmission infrastructure, successive administrations encouraged a market-led approach for the rollout of mobile phone and electronic communication networks. By reference only to the speed of roll-out and the extent of networks, the market-led policy could be judged as remarkably successful. However, a different judgment could be reached when one considers the unnecessary duplication of costs, the proliferation of sites and apparatus, and the attendant concerns about the consequences for health, property values and aesthetics. It has been estimated that if a national grid network had been adopted, 80% of existing masts could be removed.

 

COMPULSORY PURCHASE

To facilitate the roll-out of networks, legislation enshrined the principle that potential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll