header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008 / Alistair Craig
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Features , Public , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Mast Rights

Alistair Craig considers the compulsory powers to acquire and retain mobile phone masts

 

Many owners who have entered licence agreements or contracted out tenancies for the siting of mobile phone masts and electronic communications equipment now find themselves unable to secure their removal by virtue of operators’ compulsory powers to acquire and retain sites.

 

Instead of providing a national transmission infrastructure, successive administrations encouraged a market-led approach for the rollout of mobile phone and electronic communication networks. By reference only to the speed of roll-out and the extent of networks, the market-led policy could be judged as remarkably successful. However, a different judgment could be reached when one considers the unnecessary duplication of costs, the proliferation of sites and apparatus, and the attendant concerns about the consequences for health, property values and aesthetics. It has been estimated that if a national grid network had been adopted, 80% of existing masts could be removed.

 

COMPULSORY PURCHASE

To facilitate the roll-out of networks, legislation enshrined the principle that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll