header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008 / Alistair Craig
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Features , Public , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Mast Rights

Alistair Craig considers the compulsory powers to acquire and retain mobile phone masts

 

Many owners who have entered licence agreements or contracted out tenancies for the siting of mobile phone masts and electronic communications equipment now find themselves unable to secure their removal by virtue of operators’ compulsory powers to acquire and retain sites.

 

Instead of providing a national transmission infrastructure, successive administrations encouraged a market-led approach for the rollout of mobile phone and electronic communication networks. By reference only to the speed of roll-out and the extent of networks, the market-led policy could be judged as remarkably successful. However, a different judgment could be reached when one considers the unnecessary duplication of costs, the proliferation of sites and apparatus, and the attendant concerns about the consequences for health, property values and aesthetics. It has been estimated that if a national grid network had been adopted, 80% of existing masts could be removed.

 

COMPULSORY PURCHASE

To facilitate the roll-out of networks, legislation enshrined the principle that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
back-to-top-scroll