header-logo header-logo

16 November 2022
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Collective action
printer mail-detail

Mastercard's opt-out blocker fails

Mastercard has been refused permission to appeal the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) judgment greenlighting the claim in the mammoth class action launched by former Financial Ombudsman Walter Merricks.

The £14bn claim concerns multilateral interchange fees charged by Mastercard, which the European Commission later found breached competition law and resulted in higher prices for consumers. It is the first ‘opt-out’ case certified by the CAT, which means anyone who fulfils the criteria (over 16, UK domiciled between 1992 and 2008, and purchased from UK businesses that accepted Mastercard) is included unless they specifically opt out.

In a ruling handed down last week, the CAT refused permission on all four grounds, at [2022] CAT 50, on the basis the grounds advanced by Mastercard had no real prospect of success and raised no arguable point of law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll