header-logo header-logo

Mastercard action back on track

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-detail

The £14bn class action case against Mastercard―rejected by a tribunal last year―has been given Court of Appeal permission to proceed.

In a unanimous decision this week, Merricks v Mastercard [2019] EWCA Civ 674, the court ruled that Walter Merricks can bring proceedings against the bank on behalf of 46 million consumers for losses suffered due to illegal card fees. It held an earlier Competition Appeal Tribunal judgment contained errors of law and the tribunal misdirected itself about how it applied the legislative regime.

Merricks, a former Financial Ombudsman, is bringing the first mass consumer claim under the new ‘opt-out’ collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The case now returns to the tribunal.

Boris Bronfentrinker, partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, who is representing Merricks, said: ‘Whilst it had been commented that the claim against Mastercard was overblown, the Court of Appeal has... definitively determined the opposite, recognising the need for mass consumer collective actions to be able to be pursued.’

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll