header-logo header-logo

Matrimonial proceedings—Ex parte injunction—Freezing order

19 May 2011
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

ND v KP [2011] EWHC 457 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 24 (May)

Family Division, Mostyn J, 10 Feb 2011

The family division has given guidance on freezing injunctions obtained without notice.

The wife appeared in person. Rhiannon Lloyd for the husband.

During the course of ancillary relief proceedings, the applicant wife sought to move the High Court ex parte to freeze three bank accounts in Switzerland. Her grounds for making that application were, inter alia, that the husband was in a position to deplete the assets, and that there was a history of the husband acting unilaterally to remove sums of money from the jurisdiction. The judge allowed the wife’s application and she obtained a mirror order from a court in Switzerland blocking the accounts. The husband applied, inter alia, for discharge of the freezing order and for an immediate discharge of the Swiss order.

Mostyn J:

It was to be emphasised that in England, unlike some other countries on the continent, we did not have a system of general saisie conservatoire whereby

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll