header-logo header-logo

19 May 2011
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Matrimonial proceedings—Ex parte injunction—Freezing order

ND v KP [2011] EWHC 457 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 24 (May)

Family Division, Mostyn J, 10 Feb 2011

The family division has given guidance on freezing injunctions obtained without notice.

The wife appeared in person. Rhiannon Lloyd for the husband.

During the course of ancillary relief proceedings, the applicant wife sought to move the High Court ex parte to freeze three bank accounts in Switzerland. Her grounds for making that application were, inter alia, that the husband was in a position to deplete the assets, and that there was a history of the husband acting unilaterally to remove sums of money from the jurisdiction. The judge allowed the wife’s application and she obtained a mirror order from a court in Switzerland blocking the accounts. The husband applied, inter alia, for discharge of the freezing order and for an immediate discharge of the Swiss order.

Mostyn J:

It was to be emphasised that in England, unlike some other countries on the continent, we did not have a system of general saisie conservatoire

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll