header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Matters of authority

Ian Smith provides a timely update on precedents

While it is always nice to have clear authority on a point at Court of Appeal, or even House of Lords' level, there are now so many points in modern employment law on which we need authority, that first instance decisions (at common law) or decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) (in statutory matters) that do produce more light than heat are always most helpful, and can assume an importance in practical terms that would not be immediately obvious to a first year law student studying the system of precedent for the first time.

This month's column concerns three such cases: one on the common law on garden leave clauses (in a particularly sensitive context); one on an important point on the timing of statutory holidays; and one on an issue arising under the national minimum wage legislation that has a long history of difficulty under previous wage legislation and which became topical just as the case was being decided.
Garden leave and misconduct

“Absent an express provision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll