header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Matters of authority

Ian Smith provides a timely update on precedents

While it is always nice to have clear authority on a point at Court of Appeal, or even House of Lords' level, there are now so many points in modern employment law on which we need authority, that first instance decisions (at common law) or decisions of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) (in statutory matters) that do produce more light than heat are always most helpful, and can assume an importance in practical terms that would not be immediately obvious to a first year law student studying the system of precedent for the first time.

This month's column concerns three such cases: one on the common law on garden leave clauses (in a particularly sensitive context); one on an important point on the timing of statutory holidays; and one on an issue arising under the national minimum wage legislation that has a long history of difficulty under previous wage legislation and which became topical just as the case was being decided.
Garden leave and misconduct

“Absent an express provision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll