header-logo header-logo

Matters of fact

29 April 2010 / Julia Marlow , Charles Brasted
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Charles Brasted & Julia Marlow highlight the significance of a decision being quashed due to mistake of fact

The recent Court of Appeal case of Connolly & Havering LBC v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2009] EWCA Civ 1059 is a rare example of a decision being quashed on the basis of unfairness arising as a result of a mistake of fact, adding to the possibility that this could become an important ground in the future.

Traditional wariness

The court has long been reluctant to allow an application for judicial review on the basis of a mistake of fact, considering factual questions to be the domain of the public body in question. There is, however, some evidence (to which Connolly adds) that, as the court’s scrutiny of administrative decisions has become more intense, some of that reluctance has also begun to diminish.

The difficulty with allowing applications for judicial review on the basis of mistake of fact was usefully summarised in E v Secretary of State for the Home

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll